You should be aware that this is more than somewhat overblown.
The problems with GPS are basically problems with the on-orbit spares, satellites that aren't used but are available as fill-ins should one of the ones being used fail. Even if one should fail and not be replaced, the only impact would be a slight degradation of accuracy. The Air Force already has launches scheduled to remedy the deficiency.
The scare is a turf fight. There is an older system, LORAN-C, whose proponents advocate its maintenance as a support and backup for GPS, and there have been recent threats of defunding for it. I very strongly support maintaining LORAN-C and even improving it, but I regret the tactics being used.
Associate Editor: Jeremy Jacobs US Editor: Scotty Economics Editor: Rico Military Editor: Stormbringer Maine Tea Party: Andrew IanDodge Legal Editor: Bruce H News Editor:Mike W
Comedy Sketches:Steven Crowder Movie Critic: Scott Nehring Kiwi Editor: 22AD Israel Editor: DoubleTapper Contributors:
West Coast: Shelly, Peter Gunn East Coast: Canis 61, Mark H Mid West: Nebraska Bob, Wild West: Thomas H, Don E, Max B, Steve M Alabama:Jackie G Louisiana:Chad, Red Stick Michigan: Jeffrey Mississippi: Paul B Tennessee: Dick B N. Carolina: Martin Y Georgia: Marshall M
1 comments:
You should be aware that this is more than somewhat overblown.
The problems with GPS are basically problems with the on-orbit spares, satellites that aren't used but are available as fill-ins should one of the ones being used fail. Even if one should fail and not be replaced, the only impact would be a slight degradation of accuracy. The Air Force already has launches scheduled to remedy the deficiency.
The scare is a turf fight. There is an older system, LORAN-C, whose proponents advocate its maintenance as a support and backup for GPS, and there have been recent threats of defunding for it. I very strongly support maintaining LORAN-C and even improving it, but I regret the tactics being used.
Regards,
Ric
Post a Comment