Given the option, I would have chosen to spend the money on the development of nuclear fusion as a power source. Some folks are working on two or three different approaches, and it would be prudent to fund all of them.
Editor in Chief:Theo Spark Associate Editor: Jeremy Jacobs US Editor: Scotty Economics Editor: Rico Military Editor: Stormbringer Maine Tea Party: Andrew IanDodge Legal Editor: Bruce H News Editors:Paul B, Doverthere, Amnon Movie Critic: Scott Nehring Kiwi Editor: 22AD Israel Editor: DoubleTapper Special Editor:Great Satans Girlfriend Special Editor:Kristee Kelly
Contributors: West Coast: Shelly, Peter Gunn,Marc East Coast: Canis 61, Mark H Mid West: Nebraska Bob, Wild West: Thomas H, Don E, Charles E, Max B, Steve M Alabama:Jackie G Louisiana:Chad, Red Stick Rants Michigan: JeffreyN Mississippi: Paul B Tennessee: Dick B N. Carolina: Martin Y Georgia: Marshall M
UK: Liz B, Old Dude, DML,Mark W, J Rix, Andi B Canada: JMH, Pete H, Ted F Barbados: 45 Govt Germany: M Kohl Australia: Rodney Iceland: Paul N Singapore: Filippo South Africa:Loneblade
3 comments:
How does it work? judging by its track record it doesn't.
We've got one large hadron in motion here.
Given the option, I would have chosen to spend the money on the development of nuclear fusion as a power source. Some folks are working on two or three different approaches, and it would be prudent to fund all of them.
Post a Comment