Friday, 11 May 2018

So London has a homicide 'problem?'..................from Rico

While London is not as safe as it used to be, and surpassing the NYC homicide rate has gotten some media attention (hard to do when they have juicy stuff like Porny Daniels to chew on), let's take things in perspecive.
 
Look at Baltimore, New Orleans, and Detroit by way of comparison. New York doesn't even come close to their homicide rates.
- Nor does London.
 
Unsurprisingly, the worst US cities for homicide are Democrat-controlled and Gun-controlled, but they are not yet Knife-controlled or Potato-peeler-controlled, so they at least have that going for them.


2 comments:

Mark Matis said...

You blame Baltimore, New Orleans, and Detroit on Democrats. But that is NOT the problem. Instead, the real source of their troubles is fourth world culture. But then one is not allowed to talk about that now, is one???

Third world is Central and South America.

Fourth world is Africa and any Muslim nation.

Eskyman said...

There's a big difference in how homicides are counted between the UK and the USA. In the UK, a murder is only counted when someone's been convicted of murder, not by the number of bodies like in the USA. That leads to very misleading statistics (remember: lies, damned lies, and statistics.)

https://www.americas1stfreedom.org/articles/2015/7/17/how-the-uk-covers-up-murder-stats/

So in actuality, London has a LOT more murders than the numbers shown here indicate.

In Australia, a lot of "creative accounting" was used to "prove" that their gun confiscation caused murders to drop; in fact, the murder rate (as well as crime in general) rose, since criminals were now at less risk than before. For some reason, the criminals didn't have their guns confiscated, only the law-abiding people did!